Conclusie | |||||
Er is matig bewijs dat de interbeoordelaars betrouwbaarheid voor de Patrick's Test / Faber gemiddeld is. De auteurs laten hier vergelijkbare resultaten zien. |
|||||
Titel + Auteurs + Jaartal | Soort artikel | Methodologische kwaliteit | Interbeoordelaars betrouwbaarheid | ||
Kokmeyer, D., van der Wurff, P., Aufdemkampe, G., & Fickenscher, T. (2002). The reliability of multitest regimens with sacroiliac pain provocation tests. Journal of Maniplulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 25(1) | Reliability study | QUADAS-1 6/14
JADAD 2 | 0,62 PABAK 0,85 | ||
Ozgocmen, S., Bozgeyik, Z., Kalcik, M., & Yildirim, A. (2008). The value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in early active sacroiliitis. Clinical Rheumatology, 27 doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0907-z | Diagnostic accuracy study | QUADAS-1 10/14
JADAD 3 | 0,43-0,60 | ||
Arab, A. M., Abdollahi, I., Joghataei, M., Taghi, Golafshani, Z., & Kazemnejad, A. (2009). Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint. Manual Therapy, 14 | Reliability study | QUADAS-1 6/14
JADAD 2 | 0,52-0,60 | ||
Robinson-Stendal, H., Brox, J. I., Robinson, R., Bjelland-Krefting, E., Solem, S., & Telje, T. (2007). The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation testsfor the sacroiliac joint. Manual Therapy, 12 | Diagnostic accuracy study | QUADAS-1 8/14
JADAD 4 | 0,48-0,60 |